4.4 Article

Development of Green and Efficient Extraction Methods of Quercetin from Red Onion Scales Wastes Using Factorial Design for Method Optimization: A Comparative Study

Journal

SEPARATIONS
Volume 8, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/separations8090137

Keywords

quercetin; onion scales; ultrasound-assisted glycerol extraction; microwave-assisted extraction; greenness assessment

Funding

  1. Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia [TURSP-2020/56]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study introduces two new extraction methods, ultrasound-assisted glycerol extraction and microwave-assisted extraction, which were optimized for extraction efficiency using HPLC-UV and factorial design. The results showed that microwave-assisted extraction was superior to ultrasound-assisted glycerol extraction in terms of quercetin yield and time efficiency.
Waste resulting from edible plants is considered one of the best sources of valuable phytochemicals. A promising approach for using these appreciated wastes is extracting precious medically important constituents, for example, free quercetin. Two new cost-effective and green extraction methods are introduced in the present study: ultrasound-assisted glycerol extraction (UAGE) and microwave-assisted extraction (MAE). These extraction protocols are optimized using factorial design to define the highest yield of extraction, and HPLC-UV at 370 nm was used as a method of yield analysis. Quercetin remained stable during the whole process in both extraction protocols. A standard addition technique was performed to quantify quercetin in different extracts and eliminate the matrix effect. In UAGE and MAE, extraction yields were 16.55 +/- 0.81 and 27.20 +/- 1.55 mg/1g from red onion scales on a dry base, respectively. The amount of quercetin extracted using MAE was superior to UAGE in terms of time and yield. A greenness assessment of the offered studies compared to previously published relevant extraction methods was performed using the analytical eco-scale assessment method (ESA) and national environmental methods index (NEMI). MAE showed to be a greener method with a higher ESA score and a greener NEMI pictogram.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available