4.4 Article

Impact of Hypothyroidism on Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Undergoing Liver Transplantation

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENERAL MEDICINE
Volume 14, Issue -, Pages 5711-5718

Publisher

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/IJGM.S326315

Keywords

hypothyroidism; hepatocellular carcinoma; liver transplantation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that hypothyroidism is a risk factor for worse outcomes in HCC patients after liver transplantation, leading to poorer overall survival and disease-free survival rates.
Background: This work endeavored to explore the effect of hypothyroidism on mortality in subjects with HCC who underwent living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Methods: This prospective study included 107 patients with HCC subjected to LDLT, divided into hypothyroid group (n=53) and euthyroid group (n=54). The primary objectives were overall and disease-free survival (DFS). Results: Euthyroid and hypothyroid groups were comparable in all baseline characteristics except the age of patients. Overall survival (OS) of the whole group at 48 months was 68.8%, while the DFS was 60.2%. On univariate analysis, OS was negatively affected by the older age of the patients (p<0.001) or the donor (p<0.001), hypothyroidism (p=0.008), HBV (p=0.029), larger tumor size (p=0.023), and defective Milan criteria (p=0.022). On multivariate analysis, the age of the patients and donors was the independent factor affecting OS. On univariate analysis, DFS was negatively affected by older age of the patients (p < 0.001) or the donor (p=0.005), hypothyroidism (p=0.005), HBV (p=0.019), larger tumor size (p=0.023), and defective Milan criteria (p=0.020). On multivariate analysis, the age of the patients, thyroid status, and Milan criteria were the independent factors affecting DFS. Conclusion: Hypothyroidism is a risk factor for worse outcomes in HCC patients after liver transplantation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available