4.5 Article

Etiology of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome in a Large Cohort of Children

Journal

CHILDREN-BASEL
Volume 8, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/children8080624

Keywords

carpal tunnel syndrome; median nerve neuropathy; electrodiagnostic studies; neuromuscular ultrasound; mucopolysaccharidosis

Categories

Funding

  1. Swiss Muscle Society

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Carpal tunnel syndrome in childhood is rare and primarily caused by underlying disorders, with mucopolysaccharidosis being the most common underlying condition. Thorough evaluation and search for causative conditions are recommended for pediatric patients with CTS.
(1) Background: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), a compressive mononeuropathy of the median nerve at the wrist, is rare in childhood and occurs most frequently due to secondary causes. (2) Methods: Medical history, electrodiagnostic findings, and imaging data of patients with CTS from two pediatric neuromuscular centers were analyzed retrospectively. The etiology of CTS was investigated and compared with the literature. (3) Results: We report on a cohort of 38 CTS patients (n = 22 females, n = 29 bilateral, mean age at diagnosis 9.8 years). Electrodiagnostic studies of all patients revealed slowing of the antidromic sensory or orthodromic mixed nerve conduction velocities across the carpal tunnel or lack of the sensory nerve action potential and/or prolonged distal motor latencies. Median nerve ultrasound was diagnostic for CTS and confirmed tumorous and vascular malformations. Etiology was secondary in most patients (n = 29; 76%), and mucopolysaccharidosis was the most frequent underlying condition (n = 14; 37%). Idiopathic CTS was rare in this pediatric cohort (n = 9; 24%). (4) Conclusion: Since CTS in childhood is predominantly caused by an underlying disorder, a thorough evaluation and search for a causative condition is recommended in this age group.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available