4.2 Article

Osteoconductive properties of upside-down bilayer collagen membranes in rat calvarial defects

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1186/s40729-021-00333-y

Keywords

Collagen membranes; GBR; GTR; Micro-computed tomography; Histology; Histomorphometry; Preclinical research

Funding

  1. Center for Biomedical Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The alignment of bilayer collagen membranes does not affect bone regeneration, as placing the membranes with the dense layer towards the bone defect or towards the soft tissues were both effective in promoting bone regeneration. The study supports the osteoconductive properties of collagen membranes regardless of their alignment.
Background Bilayer collagen membranes are routinely used in guided bone/tissue regeneration to serve as osteoconductive scaffolds and prevent the invasion of soft tissues. It is recommended to place the membranes with their dense layer towards the soft tissue and their porous layer towards the bony defect area. However, evidence supporting this recommendation is lacking. This study aimed to determine whether the alignment of bilayer collagen membranes has an effect on bone regeneration. Methods In two groups of ten male Sprague-Dawley rats each, a 5-mm calvarial defect was created. Thereafter, the defect was randomly covered with a bilayer, resorbable, pure type I and III collagen membrane placed either regularly or upside-down (i.e., dense layer towards bone defect). After 4 weeks of healing, micro-computed tomography (mu CT), histology, and histomorphometry of the inner cylindrical region of interest (4.5 mm in diameter) were performed to assess new bone formation and the consolidation of the collagen membrane in the defect area. Results Quantitative mu CT showed similar bone volume (median 8.0 mm(3), interquartile range 7.0-10.0 vs. 6.2 mm(3), 4.3-9.4, p = 0.06) and trabecular thickness (0.21 mm, 0.19-0.23 vs. 0.18 mm, 0.17-0.20, p = 0.03) between upside-down and regular placement, both leading to an almost complete bony coverage. Histomorphometry showed comparable new bone areas between the upside-down and regularly placed membranes, 3.9 mm(2) (2.7-5.4) vs. 3.8 mm(2) (2.2-4.0, p = 0.31), respectively. Both treatment groups revealed the same regeneration patterns and spatial distribution of bone with and without collagen fibers, as well as residual collagen fibers. Conclusions Our data support the osteoconductive properties of collagen membranes and suggest that bone regeneration is facilitated regardless of membrane layer alignment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available