4.4 Review

A scoping review of researchers' involvement in health policy dialogue in Africa

Journal

SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13643-021-01745-y

Keywords

Health policy dialogue; Researchers' involvement; Africa; Barriers; Facilitators

Funding

  1. World Health Organization [001] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study identified significant differences in researchers' involvement in health policy dialogue across 21 African countries, with 62% of countries having suboptimal researcher participation. Major barriers included limited funding, lack of evidence in the public health field of interest, and skepticism from policymakers. Facilitators included the presence of an interface for exchange, demand for scientific evidence, and donors' funding.
Background: Improving evidence-informed policy dialogue to support the development and implementation of national health policies is vital, but there is limited evidence on researchers' roles in policy dialogue processes in Africa. The objective of this study is to examine researchers' involvement in health policy dialogue in Africa. Methods: The database search of this scoping review was conducted from inception to January 24, 2021, by an expert searcher/librarian to determine the extent of evidence, barriers, and facilitators of researchers' involvement in health policy dialogues in Africa. PROSPERO, Wiley Cochrane Library, OVID Medline, OVID EMBASE, OVID PsycINFO, OVID Global Health, EBSCO CINAHL, BASE (Bielefeld Academic Search Engine), and Google/Google Scholar were searched using key words representing the concepts policy dialogue, health, and Africa. No limits were applied. A narrative summary of results was presented. Results: There were 26 eligible studies representing 21 African countries. Significant discrepancies in researchers' involvement existed across countries. In 62% of the countries, there was suboptimal involvement of researchers in policy dialogues due to no or partial participation in policy dialogues. Major barriers included limited funding, lack of evidence in the public health field of interest, and skepticism of policymakers. The presence of an interface for exchange, demand for scientific evidence, and donors' funding were the most reported facilitators. Conclusions: To improve the uptake of evidence in health policy-making processes, an environment of trust and communication between policymakers and researchers must be established. Policymakers need to demonstrate that they value research, by providing adequate funding, promoting knowledge translation activities, and supporting personal and professional development opportunities for researchers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available