4.4 Article

Myelopathic Patients Undergoing Severe Pediatric Spinal Deformity Surgery Can Improve Neurologic Function to That of Non-Myelopathic Patients by 1-Year Postoperative

Journal

GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages 1384-1393

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/21925682211034837

Keywords

severe pediatric spinal deformity; pediatric spine surgery; scoliosis; myelopathy; neurologic function; neurologic deficit

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to compare myelopathic and non-myelopathic ambulatory patients in terms of neurologic function, operative treatment, and patient-reported outcomes. The results showed that myelopathic patients experienced significant improvement in neurologic function postoperatively, with no difference between the two groups at 1-year and 2-year postoperative. Non-myelopathic patients had higher scores in some SRS domains, but both groups showed significant improvement in all domains.
Study Design: Multi-center, prospective, observational cohort. Objective: To compare myelopathic vs. non-myelopathic ambulatory patients in short- and long-term neurologic function, operative treatment, and patient-reported outcomes. Methods: Pediatric deformity patients from 16 centers were enrolled with the following inclusion criteria: aged 10-21 years-old, a Cobb angle >= 100 degrees in either the coronal or sagittal plane or any sized deformity with a planned 3-column osteotomy, and community ambulators. Patients were dichotomized into 2 groups: myelopathic (abnormal preoperative neurologic exam with signs/symptoms of myelopathy) and non-myelopathic (no clinical signs/symptoms of myelopathy). Results: Of 311 patients with an average age of 14.7 +/- 2.8 years, 29 (9.3%) were myelopathic and 282 (90.7%) were non-myelopathic. There was no difference in age (P = 0.18), gender (P = 0.09), and Risser Stage (P = 0.06), while more patients in the non-myelopathic group had previous surgery (16.1% vs. 3.9%; P = 0.03). Mean lower extremity motor score (LEMS) in myelopathic patients increased significantly compared to baseline at every postoperative visit: Baseline: 40.7 +/- 9.9; Immediate postop: 46.0 +/- 7.1, P = 0.02; 1-year: 48.2 +/- 3.7, P < 0.001; 2-year: 48.2 +/- 7.7, P < 0.001). The non-myelopathic group had significantly higher LEMS immediately postoperative (P = 0.0007), but by 1-year postoperative, there was no difference in LEMS between groups (non-myelopathic: 49.3 +/- 3.6, myelopathic: 48.2 +/- 3.7, P = 0.10) and was maintained at 2-years postoperative (non-myelopathic: 49.2 +/- 3.3, myelopathic: 48.2 +/- 5.7, P = 0.09). Both groups improved significantly in all SRS domains compared to preoperative, with no difference in scores in the domains for pain (P = 0.12), self-image (P = 0.08), and satisfaction (P = 0.83) at latest follow-up. Conclusion: In severe spinal deformity pediatric patients presenting with preoperative myelopathy undergoing spinal reconstructive surgery, myelopathic patients can expect significant improvement in neurologic function postoperatively. At 1-year and 2-year postoperative, neurologic function was no different between groups. While non-myelopathic patients had significantly higher postoperative outcomes in SRS mental-health, function, and total-score, both groups had significantly improved outcomes in every SRS domain compared to preoperative.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available