4.5 Review

Progress in treatment of type 2 diabetes by bariatric surgery

Journal

WORLD JOURNAL OF DIABETES
Volume 12, Issue 8, Pages 1187-1199

Publisher

BAISHIDENG PUBLISHING GROUP INC
DOI: 10.4239/wjd.v12.i8.1187

Keywords

Obesity; Bariatric surgery; Type 2 diabetes; Insulin resistance; Bile acids; Microbiota

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81670481]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The global incidence of type 2 diabetes is on the rise, and bariatric surgical procedures are effective in providing relief. The mechanisms of these surgeries involve increased satiety and alterations in gastrointestinal hormones. Understanding these mechanisms can aid in developing better non-surgical treatments for type 2 diabetes.
The incidence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) is increasing at an alarming rate worldwide. Bariatric surgical procedures, such as the vertical sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, are the most efficient approaches to obtain substantial and durable remission of T2D. The benefits of bariatric surgery are realized through the consequent increased satiety and alterations in gastrointestinal hormones, bile acids, and the intestinal microbiota. A comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms by which various bariatric surgical procedures exert their benefits on T2D could contribute to the design of better non-surgical treatments for T2D. In this review, we describe the classification and evolution of bariatric surgery and explore the multiple mechanisms underlying the effect of bariatric surgery on insulin resistance. Based upon our summarization of the current knowledge on the underlying mechanisms, we speculate that the gut might act as a new target for improving T2D. Our ultimate goal with this review is to provide a better understanding of T2D pathophysiology in order to support development of T2D treatments that are less invasive and more scalable.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available