4.6 Review

Clinical value of 3'-deoxy-3'-[18F]fluorothymidine-positron emission tomography for diagnosis, staging and assessing therapy response in lung cancer

Journal

INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1186/s13244-021-01026-1

Keywords

Positron emission tomography; PET; Lung cancer; Fluorothymidine; [F-18]FLT

Funding

  1. Royal Embassy of Saudi Arabia, Cultural Bureau in London, UK
  2. Friends of Anchor

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lung cancer has the highest mortality rate among all tumor types, largely due to uncontrolled cellular proliferation. [F-18]FLT-PET offers a non-invasive method to accurately assess cell proliferation rates, improving the accuracy of diagnosis, staging, and therapy response evaluation for lung cancer.
Lung cancer has the highest mortality rate of any tumour type. The main driver of lung tumour growth and development is uncontrolled cellular proliferation. Poor patient outcomes are partly the result of the limited range of effective anti-cancer therapies available and partly due to the limited accuracy of biomarkers to report on cell proliferation rates in patients. Accordingly, accurate methods of diagnosing, staging and assessing response to therapy are crucial to improve patient outcomes. One effective way of assessing cell proliferation is to employ non-invasive evaluation using 3'-deoxy-3'-[F-18]fluorothymidine ([F-18]FLT) positron emission tomography [F-18]FLT-PET. [F-18]FLT, unlike the most commonly used PET tracer [F-18]fluorodeoxyglucose ([F-18]FDG), can specifically report on cell proliferation and does not accumulate in inflammatory cells. Therefore, this radiotracer could exhibit higher specificity in diagnosis and staging, along with more accurate monitoring of therapy response at early stages in the treatment cycle. This review summarises and evaluates published studies on the clinical use of [F-18]FLT to diagnose, stage and assess response to therapy in lung cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available