4.6 Article

On the Optimal Design of Underactuated Fingers Using Rolling Contact Joints

Journal

IEEE ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION LETTERS
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages 4656-4663

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LRA.2021.3068976

Keywords

Joints; Measurement; Force; Optimization; Grasping; Friction; Prototypes; Grasping; grippers and other end-effectors; multifingered hands; prosthetics and exoskeletons

Categories

Funding

  1. Fonds de Recherche duQuebec, Nature et Technologie (FRQNT)
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  3. Canada Research Chair program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article addresses the design of underactuated fingers using rolling contact joints to improve performance in robotic and prosthetic hands applications. The study extends the design space and adapts performance metrics for underactuated fingers. Optimization based on these metrics using genetic algorithms results in improved finger performance.
The design of underactuated fingers using rolling contact joints is addressed in this article in order to increase performance in robotic and prosthetic hands applications. Rolling contact joints have proven to be a promising alternative to revolute joints by increasing the range of motion, introducing compliance and decreasing internal friction. The conditions of optimal design for fingers using such joints are however not well stated. In order to fully exploit the potential of rolling-contact-joint based fingers, their design space is extended and performance metrics adapted to underactuated fingers are used in this letter. An optimization based on these metrics is performed over the large design space using genetic algorithms to find an optimal design. The solution obtained is then used to build a prototype and its performance is compared to that predicted by the model and to a comparative design using a realistic test bench.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available