Journal
SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION
Volume 27, Issue -, Pages 337-353Publisher
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2020.11.001
Keywords
Circular economy; policy analysis; discourse analysis; environmental governance; sustainability; circular society
Funding
- European Union's Hori-zon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie SkodowskaCurie grant [765198]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The paper discusses the gap between the discourse and policies of the EU on circular economy, highlighting the need for plural actions to address the systemic challenges of a circular future.
Since the publication of the European Union's Circular Economy Action Plan in 2015, this new sustainability paradigm has become a guiding force behind the environmental and economic policies of the Junker Commission. The European Union (EU) has taken a particular approach to circularity, with high expectations to increase competitiveness, promote economic growth and create jobs while reducing environmental impacts and resource dependency. However, the circular economy (CE) is a contested paradigm, for which many competing interpretations exist, each seeking varying degrees of social, ecological and political transformation. Considering the emerging and contested state of the academic literature on CE, the EU's embrace of the concept is a remarkable phenomenon, which remains poorly researched. The aim of this paper is thus to address this research gap by analysing the CE discourse and policies of the Junker Commission (2014-2019) in order to critically discuss their sustainability implications and develop key policy recommendations. To do so, this research uses a combination of qualitative and quantitative research methods. The paper first critically analyses the EU's discourse based on a typology of circularity discourses. It then reviews the complex set of concrete CE policies and actions adopted by the EU and compares them to its discourse. Results show a dichotomy between words and actions, with a discourse that is rather holistic, while policies focus on end of pipe solutions and do not address the many socio-ecological implications of a circularity transition. Several actions are thus recommended to tackle the systemic challenges of a circular future from a plural perspective. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Institution of Chemical Engineers.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available