4.6 Article

A hybrid ant lion optimization chicken swarm optimization algorithm for charger placement problem

Journal

COMPLEX & INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages 2791-2808

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s40747-021-00510-x

Keywords

Swarm intelligence; Ant lion optimization; Chicken swarm optimization; Charger; Electric vehicle; Optimization; Metaheuristics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Transportation electrification is seen as a viable solution to global warming, air pollution, and energy crisis, but the optimal placement of charging infrastructure for Electric Vehicles presents a complex problem involving multiple design variables, objective functions, and constraints.
Transportation electrification is known to be a viable alternative to deal with the alarming issues of global warming, air pollution, and energy crisis. Public acceptance of Electric Vehicles (EVs) requires the availability of charging infrastructure. However, the optimal placement of chargers is indeed a complex problem with multiple design variables, objective functions, and constraints. Chargers must be placed with the EV drivers' convenience and security of the power distribution network being taken into account. The solutions to such an emerging optimization problem are mostly based on metaheuristics. This work proposes a novel metaheuristic considering the hybridization of Chicken Swarm Optimization (CSO) with Ant Lion Optimization (ALO) for effectively and efficiently coping with the charger placement problem. The amalgamation of CSO with ALO can enhance the performance of ALO, thereby preventing it from getting stuck in the local optima. Our hybrid algorithm has the strengths from both CSO and ALO, which is tested on the standard benchmark functions as well as the above charger placement problem. Simulation results demonstrate that it performs moderately better than the counterpart methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available