Biocompatibility and Antibiofilm Properties of Calcium Silicate-Based Cements: An In Vitro Evaluation and Report of Two Clinical Cases

Simple Summary Calcium silicate-based cements are successfully applied in the different fields of endodontics and vital pulp therapy. To better assess the properties of these bioactive materials, the present in vitro and in vivo study aimed to compare the biocompatibility and antibiofilm properties of ProRoot MTA and Biodentine. Human osteogenic sarcoma (Saos-2) cells were cultured in the presence of both materials and evaluated. Moreover, the bioactive cements were in vivo applied to perform vital pulp therapy on immature permanent teeth affected by reversible pulpitis. Saos-2 cells' viability was slightly greater in the presence of ProRootMTA than Biodentine and cells would grow in a better way on ProRootMTA disks than on Biodentine ones. Moreover, ProRootMTA showed a powerful antibiofilm effect towards Streptococcus mutans. The in vitro results were clinically supported by a 100% success rate after 2 years of follow-up. Calcium silicate-based cements have reached excellent levels of performance in endodontics, providing predictable and successful results. To better assess the properties of these bioactive materials, the present study aimed to compare the biocompatibility and antibiofilm properties of ProRoot MTA and Biodentine. Human osteogenic sarcoma (Saos-2) cells were cultured on ProRoot MTA and Biodentine samples or in the presence of both cement extracts. Cell viability assay, measurement of reactive oxygen species (ROS), immunofluorescence analysis, as well as morphological evaluations were conducted. Moreover, Streptococcus mutans was used to assess the biofilm forming ability on ProRoot MTA and Biodentine disks. Finally, both cements were applied in vivo to treat immature permanent teeth affected by reversible pulpitis. Results: Cell viability assay demonstrated that Saos-2 cells had a dose- and time-dependent cytotoxicity to both analyzed cements, although cells exposed to ProRoot MTA showed a better cell vitality than those exposed to Biodentine (p < 0.001). Both cements demonstrated ROS production while this was greater in the case of Biodentine than ProRoot MTA (p < 0.001). Immunofluorescence images of the cytoskeleton and focal adhesions showed no differences in Saos-2 cells grown in the presence of ProRoot MTA eluate; whereas in the Biodentine groups, cells showed a morphology and focal adhesions more similar to that of the control sample, as the eluate concentration decreased. Morphological analysis revealed that Saos-2 cells were more flattened and exhibited better spreading when attached to ProRoot MTA disks than to Biodentine ones. The antibiofilm properties showed a time-dependent powerful inhibition of S. mutans superficial colonization and an antibiofilm effect of both cements. Clinically, complete root formation of the treated elements was achieved using the two studied cements, showing stable results over time. ProRoot MTA and Biodentine was demonstrated to be biocompatible and to possess antibiofilm properties. Their clinical application in vital pulp therapy provided successful outcomes after 2 years of follow-up.

Automated summary

This study compared the biocompatibility and antibiofilm properties of ProRoot MTA and Biodentine, with ProRoot MTA showing better cell vitality and antibiofilm effect. Both cements demonstrated stable and successful outcomes in vitro experiments and in vivo treatments, indicating predictable and successful results in endodontic therapy.