4.6 Article

Bone Diagenesis in Short Timescales: Insights from an Exploratory Proteomic Analysis

Journal

BIOLOGY-BASEL
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biology10060460

Keywords

taphonomy; bone proteomics; PMI; microbial decomposition; bioerosion; forensic sciences

Categories

Funding

  1. Royal Society [RGS/R1/191371]
  2. UKRI [MR/S032878/1]
  3. UKRI [MR/S032878/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study utilized proteomic technologies to analyze the effects of different post-mortem conditions on protein in decomposing rat bones, revealing associations between specific proteins and microbial-led decomposition or post-depositional environments. Muscle- and calcium-binding proteins were more prone to degradation by bacterial attack, while plasma and bone marrow proteins were more susceptible to exposure to extrinsic agents.
Simple Summary Understanding the origin of bone degradation led by bacterial decomposition is essential in order to allow for the creation of better models to estimate the time elapsed since death for forensic casework, as well as for the preservation of archaeological specimens over the course of time. Within this study we applied modern proteomic technologies in order to evaluate how proteins in decomposing rat bones are affected by different post-mortem conditions, such as different depositional environments (buried versus exposed samples) and different sample types (whole carcasses versus fleshed limbs versus defleshed bones), over a period of 28 weeks. We found that the abundance of specific proteins was associated either with a microbial-led type of decomposition or with a specific post-depositional environment. Overall, this study shows that proteomic analyses can be useful to identify microbially- versus non-microbially driven decomposition, and that specific proteins-such as bone marrow and plasma proteins-can be more affected than others by extrinsic agents, whereas calcium-binding proteins seem to be more affected by microbial degradation. The evaluation of bone diagenetic phenomena in archaeological timescales has a long history; however, little is known about the origins of the microbes driving bone diagenesis, nor about the extent of bone diagenesis in short timeframes-such as in forensic contexts. Previously, the analysis of non-collagenous proteins (NCPs) through bottom-up proteomics revealed the presence of potential biomarkers useful in estimating the post-mortem interval (PMI). However, there is still a great need for enhancing the understanding of the diagenetic processes taking place in forensic timeframes, and to clarify whether proteomic analyses can help to develop better models for estimating PMI reliably. To address these knowledge gaps, we designed an experiment based on whole rat carcasses, defleshed long rat bones, and excised but still-fleshed rat limbs, which were either buried in soil or exposed on a clean plastic surface, left to decompose for 28 weeks, and retrieved at different time intervals. This study aimed to assess differences in bone protein relative abundances for the various deposition modalities and intervals. We further evaluated the effects that extrinsic factors, autolysis, and gut and soil bacteria had on bone diagenesis via bottom-up proteomics. Results showed six proteins whose abundance was significantly different between samples subjected to either microbial decomposition (gut or soil bacteria) or to environmental factors. In particular, muscle- and calcium-binding proteins were found to be more prone to degradation by bacterial attack, whereas plasma and bone marrow proteins were more susceptible to exposure to extrinsic agents. Our results suggest that both gut and soil bacteria play key roles in bone diagenesis and protein decay in relatively short timescales, and that bone proteomics is a proficient resource with which to identify microbially-driven versus extrinsically-driven diagenesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available