4.6 Review

Traditional Chinese Medicine for Coronary Artery Disease Treatment: Clinical Evidence From Randomized Controlled Trials

Journal

FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.702110

Keywords

traditional Chinese medicine; coronary artery disease; review; randomized controlled trial; complementary and alternative medicine

Funding

  1. Research and Practice Innovation Plan for Postgraduates of Jiangsu, China [KYCX21_1641]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81774229]
  3. Jiangsu Leading Talent Project of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Jiangsu TCM 2018) [4]
  4. Jiangsu Universities Nursing Advantage Discipline Project [2019YSHL095]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Traditional Chinese medicine has a long history and is widely used in clinical practice, but its role in the prevention and treatment of coronary artery disease remains unclear due to lack of scientific evidence. Randomized controlled trials have shown that traditional Chinese medicine can be used as a complementary method in managing coronary artery disease, with similar safety profile to conventional medications. Further research with long-term endpoints is needed to fully assess its safety and efficacy.
Traditional Chinese medicine has a history of more than 2,000 years and has been widely used in clinical practice. However, due to the lack of a reliable scientific basis, the role of traditional Chinese medicine in the prevention and treatment of coronary artery disease is not clear. At present, the existing randomized controlled trials about traditional Chinese medicine for coronary artery disease have defects, small sample sizes, and different results, so it is difficult to make a clear conclusion on the actual advantages and disadvantages of traditional Chinese medicine. In this review, the efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine in the prevention and treatment of coronary artery disease were systematically evaluated through randomized controlled trials, most of which were double-blind trials. We reviewed 17 randomized controlled trials that included a total of 11,726 coronary artery disease patients. The methodological quality of the trials was generally high, with nine (52.94%) having a modified Jadad score of 7 and only three (17.65%) having a modified Jadad score of <3. There are 16 trials (94.12%) reporting safety; the safety of traditional Chinese medicine seems not to be inferior to that of mimetic, placebo, or western medications. Moreover, the results from 17 randomized controlled trials (100.00%) showed that traditional Chinese medicine can be applied as a complementary and alternative method to the primary and secondary prevention of coronary artery disease, and only six trials (35.29%) described adverse cardiovascular events specifically. However, it is necessary to assess the safety and efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine in treating coronary artery disease with long-term hard endpoints.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available