4.7 Article

Computational fluid dynamics model for a variable conductance thermosyphon

Journal

CASE STUDIES IN THERMAL ENGINEERING
Volume 25, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.csite.2021.100960

Keywords

Variable conductance heat pipe; CFD; Two-phase flow; Diffused interface

Categories

Funding

  1. NASA Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) under an STTR Phase I program [80NSSC18P2155]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model was developed to predict the behavior of a variable conductance thermosyphon in different operating temperatures, showing accurate results compared to experimental data.
A variable conductance thermosyphon is a unique type of heat pipe that responds passively to changes in thermal environment because of the presence of non-condensable gas (NCG). In this study, we develop a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model to predict the behavior of a cylindrical-shaped variable conductance thermosyphon in the vertical orientation for a range of evaporator-side operating temperatures between 66.70 degrees C and 87.32 degrees C. Experiments are performed on a variable conductance thermosyphon that is made of a 262 mm long stainless steel tube with an outer diameter of 9.5 mm and a wall thickness of 0.92 mm. The working fluid is methanol and the NCG is argon. The model is able to predict the fluid flow and heat transfer in the fluid domain and the conjugate heat transfer to the solid wall domain. Experimental thermocouple data for both forced convection and natural convection test cases show temperature remaining almost uniform in the adiabatic section and dropping rapidly across the vapor/NCG interface between the vapor and NCG. This behavior of wall temperature change was also captured accurately by the CFD model, evidenced by MAEs of 3.09% and 3.52% for forced and natural convection test cases, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available