4.6 Article

Extracorporeal Photopheresis in Children with Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease

Journal

PHARMACEUTICALS
Volume 14, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ph14080808

Keywords

children; chronic graft versus host disease; extracorporeal photopheresis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the efficacy and safety of extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) in children with chronic graft versus host disease (cGVHD). The results showed that a portion of patients responded partially or completely to ECP treatment, with a certain survival rate within 5 years.
Chronic graft versus host disease (cGVHD) remains a major complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). It significantly decreases survival and quality of life. The present study demonstrates retrospective data on extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) in children with cGVHD. A total of 42 children with steroid-refractory cGVHD were enrolled in the study. The majority of patients had acute leukemia (n = 32, 76%). All patients received ECP as second (n = 18, 43%) or third (n = 24, 57%) line of therapy. Initial ECP schedule consisted of bimonthly regimen for two consecutive days with possibility of further tapering according to response. Any concurrent treatment administered before ECP could be continued if considered necessary. Complete response to ECP was registered in seven (17%) patients and partial response in 24 (57%). Overall response according to organ involvement was as follows: skin (n = 24, 75%), mucous membranes (n = 16, 73%), liver (n = 8, 80%), gut (n = 4, 80%), lungs (n = 2, 22%) and joints (n = 2, 67%). Five-year overall, progression-free and failure-free survival was 57%, 56% and 30%, respectively. Non-relapse mortality at 5 years was 14%. We didn't observe any clinically significant complications in children that could be attributed to the procedure. ECP remains important and safe treatment option in children with cGVHD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available