4.5 Article

Formulation and Characterization of Formaldehyde-Free Chemically Modified Bone-Based Adhesive for Lignocellulosic Composite Products

Journal

GLOBAL CHALLENGES
Volume 5, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/gch2.202100002

Keywords

biobased adhesive; chemical modification; mechanical properties; particleboards; physical properties; sugarcane bagasse

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the efficacy of chemically modified bone adhesive as a formaldehyde-free binder for wood-based industries. The results show that adhesive Type C (T-C) has the shortest gel time and highest shear strength, making it suitable for particleboard fabrication.
This study investigates the efficacy of chemically modified bone adhesive as a formaldehyde-free binder for wood-based industries. Two different types of adhesive are formulated after chemical modification of bone powder using sulfuric acid (0.5 M) and polyvinyl acetate (PVA). Gel time, solid content, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), viscosity, and single lap joint test for shear strength are analyzed in order to assess the adhesive properties. To analyze the efficacy of the formulated adhesive, particleboards are fabricated using boiled and unboiled sugarcane bagasse. The physical and mechanical properties of the fabricated panels are measured following ASTM standards. It is found that adhesive Type C (T-C) has the shortest gel time of 4.2 min for the highest shear strength, i.e., 5.31 MPa. The particleboard (BTC-2) fabricated using T-C adhesive shows a highest density of 0.73 g cm(-3), a modulus of elasticity (MOE) of 1975 N mm(-2), and a modulus of rupture (MOR) of 11.80 N mm(-2). The dimensional stability of the fabricated particleboards does not follow the standard requirements; however, further study might be helpful for using the chemically modified bone adhesive as a biobased adhesive.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available