4.7 Article

Estimation of daily global solar radiation using empirical and machine-learning methods: A case study of five Moroccan locations

Journal

SUSTAINABLE MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGIES
Volume 28, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.susmat.2021.e00261

Keywords

Global horizontal solar irradiance; Empirical models; Machine-learning models

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study tested multiple models and techniques and found that the Random Forest method performed the best in estimating solar radiation accuracy. In the study of five locations in Morocco, the Temperature - Geographic factors model also proved to be a viable choice.
Reliable solar radiation data are essential to study the feasibility and to determine the optimal size of solar plants in a particular location. However, the network of solar radiation measurement stations is very weak around the world. This has led to the development of a wide variety of models and techniques for estimating solar radiation from commonly measured meteorological variables (Ambient air temperature, relative humidity, wind velocity ...). In this work, 22 empirical models, Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) techniques, and tree-based ensemble methods were tested in estimating the daily global solar radiation (GSR) in five Moroccan locations. Each database was partitioned into two sets: the training set and the validation set. The training set is used to calibrate the models, while the validation set is used to assess their credibility. The best-performing model at each station was selected based on three statistical indictors, the coefficient of correlation (R), the normalized mean absolute error (nMAE) and the normalized root mean square error (nRMSE). The results on the validation dataset revealed that the Random Forest method (R: 87.53-96.20%; nMAE: 5.84-11.81%; nRMSE: 7.85-15.33%) outperformed the all tested models in terms of accuracy. The other machine learning methods achieved generally good performance (R: 81.73-95.14%; nMAE: 5.88-13.86%; nRMSE: 8.22-18%). Among the empirical models (R: 56.58-93.46%; nMAE: 6.96-21.83%; nRMSE: 9.89-26.96%), the Temperature - Geographic factors model (TG1) (R: 72.38-93.46%; nMAE: 6.96-17.94%; nRMSE: 9.89-22.39%) can be recommended for estimating the GSR for the all considered stations. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available