Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Hierarchical Test of General Relativity with Gravitational Waves
Maximiliano Isi et al.
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS (2019)
On combining information from multiple gravitational wave sources
Aaron Zimmerman et al.
PHYSICAL REVIEW D (2019)
Tests of general relativity with the binary black hole signals from the LIGO-Virgo catalog GWTC-1
B. P. Abbott et al.
PHYSICAL REVIEW D (2019)
A Surrogate model of gravitational waveforms from numerical relativity simulations of precessing binary black hole mergers
Jonathan Blackman et al.
PHYSICAL REVIEW D (2017)
Theoretical physics implications of the binary black-hole mergers GW150914 and GW151226
Nicolas Yunes et al.
PHYSICAL REVIEW D (2016)
Testing general relativity with present and future astrophysical observations
Emanuele Berti et al.
CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM GRAVITY (2015)
Quantifying and mitigating bias in inference on gravitational wave source populations
Jonathan R. Gair et al.
PHYSICAL REVIEW D (2015)
Gravitational-wave sensitivity curves
C. J. Moore et al.
CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM GRAVITY (2015)
Advanced Virgo: a second-generation interferometric gravitational wave detector
F. Acernese et al.
CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM GRAVITY (2015)
Stealth bias in gravitational-wave parameter estimation
Michele Vallisneri et al.
PHYSICAL REVIEW D (2013)
Networks of gravitational wave detectors and three figures of merit
Bernard F. Schutz
CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM GRAVITY (2011)
Model waveform accuracy standards for gravitational wave data analysis
Lee Lindblom et al.
PHYSICAL REVIEW D (2008)
LISA detections of massive black hole inspirals: Parameter extraction errors due to inaccurate template waveforms
Curt Cutler et al.
PHYSICAL REVIEW D (2007)
Share Paper
