4.7 Article

High-Efficiency Lead-Free Wide Band Gap Perovskite Solar Cells via Guanidinium Bromide Incorporation

Journal

ACS APPLIED ENERGY MATERIALS
Volume 4, Issue 6, Pages 5615-5624

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.1c00413

Keywords

wide band gap; lead free; energy band alignment; A-site engineering; crystal growth

Funding

  1. JST Mirai Program [JPMJMI17EA]
  2. Chinese Scholarship Council [CSC202008050034]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explores the fabrication of wide band gap ASnI(2)Br perovskite solar cells and demonstrates the potential of tin-halide perovskite solar cells in the fabrication of lead-free all-perovskite tandem solar cells.
Despite lead halide perovskite(top)/silicon(bottom) tandem solar cell achieving >29% efficiency, the toxicity of lead limits the adoption of perovskites in electronic devices. To solve this problem, tin perovskite has been suggested as an alternative candidate to be used as the top cell. However, most of the reports on tin perovskite solar cells are based on narrow band gap materials (band gap: 1.20-1.40 eV), which are not suitable to be used as the tandem top cell. In addition, the efficiency of the previously reported wide band gap lead-free perovskites is not satisfactory, shown to be less than 2.00%. This study explores the fabrication of the wide band gap (1.61 eV) ASnI(2)Br perovskite solar cells through the optimization of formamidinium and guanidinium content to improve the efficiency from 1.68 to 7.00%. Substituting the A site with larger cation results in a larger crystal size, which translated into higher device stability. Better energy-level alignment within the device significantly enhanced the charge injection and extraction, which translated into higher open-circuit voltage. This work provides proof that tin-halide perovskite solar cells have the potential in the fabrication of lead-free all-perovskite tandem solar cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available