4.6 Article

Biodiversity of Lignicolous Freshwater Hyphomycetes from China and Thailand and Description of Sixteen Species

Journal

JOURNAL OF FUNGI
Volume 7, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jof7080669

Keywords

Aquapteridospora bambusinum; asexual-morph; new species; phylogeny; taxonomy

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [32060005, 31970021]
  2. Fungal diversity conservation and utilization innovation team [ZKLX2019213]
  3. Thailand Research Fund [RDG6130001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reported the diversity of freshwater hyphomycetes in the Greater Mekong subregion, describing multiple new species, new combinations, and new country records. Additionally, a checklist of freshwater fungi from China over the last five years was provided.
Freshwater hyphomycetes are a highly diverse group of fungi with a worldwide distribution and have been mostly reported from tropical and subtropical regions. During investigations of freshwater fungi from the Greater Mekong subregion in China and Thailand, sixteen freshwater hyphomycetes (three of them belong to the class Dothideomycetes while thirteen belong to the class Sordariomycetes) were collected. Based on morphology and multi-gene phylogenetic analyses, Neospadicoides thailandica, Pseudodactylaria aquatica, Sporidesmium nujiangense, Tetraploa thailandica, Vamsapriya aquatica and Wongia fusiformis are described as new species; Aquapteridospora bambusinum is proposed as a new combination; Acrodictys liputii, Chloridium gonytrichii, Pseudoberkleasmium chiangmaiense, Pleomonodictys capensis, Sporidesmium aturbinatum and Vamsapriya indica are reported as new country records; and Sporidesmium tropicale, Sporoschisma chiangraiense and Sporoschisma longicatenatum are introduced as three new collections. In addition, a checklist of freshwater fungi from China over the last five years is also provided.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available