4.6 Review

Immune Cell Degranulation in Fungal Host Defence

Journal

JOURNAL OF FUNGI
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jof7060484

Keywords

granule; degranulation; trafficking; host defence

Funding

  1. CIHR [365812]
  2. Jesse Bowden Lloyd Professorship in Immunology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review explores mechanisms of fungal host defense by the immune system, highlighting both similarities and differences in granule morphology, content, release process, etc. among different immune cells, aiming to facilitate further research in this area.
Humans have developed complex immune systems that defend against invading microbes, including fungal pathogens. Many highly specialized cells of the immune system share the ability to store antimicrobial compounds in membrane bound organelles that can be immediately deployed to eradicate or inhibit growth of invading pathogens. These membrane-bound organelles consist of secretory vesicles or granules, which move to the surface of the cell, where they fuse with the plasma membrane to release their contents in the process of degranulation. Lymphocytes, macrophages, neutrophils, mast cells, eosinophils, and basophils all degranulate in fungal host defence. While anti-microbial secretory vesicles are shared among different immune cell types, information about each cell type has emerged independently leading to an uncoordinated and confusing classification of granules and incomplete description of the mechanism by which they are deployed. While there are important differences, there are many similarities in granule morphology, granule content, stimulus for degranulation, granule trafficking, and release of granules against fungal pathogens. In this review, we describe the similarities and differences in an attempt to translate knowledge from one immune cell to another that may facilitate further studies in the context of fungal host defence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available