4.7 Article

Carbon Nanofibers versus Silver Nanoparticles: Time-Dependent Cytotoxicity, Proliferation, and Gene Expression

Journal

BIOMEDICINES
Volume 9, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines9091155

Keywords

silver nanoparticles; carbon nanofibers; human keratinocytes; cytotoxicity; proliferation; gene expression

Funding

  1. Fundacion Universidad Catolica de Valencia San Vicente Martir [2020-231-006UCV]
  2. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion [PID2020-119333RB-I00/AEI/10.13039/501100011033]
  3. Universitat Jaume I for Project [UJI-B2019-30]
  4. Generalitat Valenciana
  5. Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovacion y Universidades (Spain) [PGC2018- 094417-B-I00]
  6. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo-FAPESP (FAPESP CEPID) [2013/07296-2]
  7. FINEP
  8. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico-CNPq [166281/2017-4]
  9. CAPES [001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that CNFs and AgNPs exhibited similar time-dependent cytotoxicity and proliferative activity in HaCaT cells, but showed significant differences in the expression of 13 genes, with CNFs being more effective in regulating genes related to oxidative stress defense mechanisms and tissue maintenance and repair.
Carbon nanofibers (CNFs) are one-dimensional nanomaterials with excellent physical and broad-spectrum antimicrobial properties characterized by a low risk of antimicrobial resistance. Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) are antimicrobial metallic nanomaterials already used in a broad range of industrial applications. In the present study these two nanomaterials were characterized by Raman spectroscopy, transmission electron microscopy, zeta potential, and dynamic light scattering, and their biological properties were compared in terms of cytotoxicity, proliferation, and gene expression in human keratinocyte HaCaT cells. The results showed that both AgNPs and CNFs present similar time-dependent cytotoxicity (EC50 of 608.1 mu g/mL for CNFs and 581.9 mu g/mL for AgNPs at 24 h) and similar proliferative HaCaT cell activity. However, both nanomaterials showed very different results in the expression of thirteen genes (superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1), catalase (CAT), matrix metallopeptidase 1 (MMP1), transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGFB1), glutathione peroxidase 1 (GPX1), fibronectin 1 (FN1), hyaluronan synthase 2 (HAS2), laminin subunit beta 1 (LAMB1), lumican (LUM), cadherin 1 CDH1, collagen type IV alpha (COL4A1), fibrillin (FBN), and versican (VCAN)) treated with the lowest non-cytotoxic concentrations in the HaCaT cells after 24 h. The AgNPs were capable of up-regulating only two genes (SOD1 and MMP1) while the CNFs were very effective in up-regulating eight genes (FN1, MMP1, CAT, CDH1, COL4A1, FBN, GPX1, and TGFB1) involved in the defense mechanisms against oxidative stress and maintaining and repairing tissues by regulating cell adhesion, migration, proliferation, differentiation, growth, morphogenesis, and tissue development. These results demonstrate CNF nanomaterials' unique great potential in biomedical applications such as tissue engineering and wound healing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available