4.3 Article

Effects of nitrogen fertilization and cutting intensity on the agronomic performance of warm-season grasses

Journal

GRASS AND FORAGE SCIENCE
Volume 72, Issue 4, Pages 663-675

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/gfs.12267

Keywords

cutting intensity; dry-matter yield; light interception; N supply; nutritive value; tropical grasses

Categories

Funding

  1. IAPAR
  2. Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) [562688/2010-2, 478160/2013-5]
  3. CNPq [306628/2015-5]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Responses of grasses to N fertilization are affected by cutting intensity although little is known regarding the interactions of these factors in warm-season grasses. Pre-cutting canopy height, herbage accumulation and changes in the nutritive value of warm-season grasses in response to four different management strategies were assessed from October 2011 to September 2014. Treatments included two cutting intensities (70 vs. 50% depletion of canopy height set by 95% light interception), two N fertilization levels (zero vs. 300 kg N ha(-1) year(-1)) and six perennial C-4 grass species (Axonopus catharinensis; Cynodon spp. hybrid Tifton 85; Hemarthria altissima cv. Florida; Megathyrsus maximus cv. Aruana; Paspalum notatum cv. Pensacola; and Urochloa brizantha cv. Marandu) grown in monoculture in a factorial experimental design. Canopy height varied among grass species, cutting intensity and N treatments, mainly among seasons, indicating that more than one management target (i.e. canopy height) existed throughout the plant growth cycle for each species. The largest herbage accumulation occurred in the N fertilization treatments for most species, regardless of cutting intensity. Nitrogen fertilization and 50% depletion of canopy height increased the leaf proportion and decreased the neutral detergent fibre content. Overall, N fertilization had a stronger positive impact than cutting intensity on the acid detergent fibre content, dry-matter digestibility and crude protein content, but the magnitudes of the responses were species-specific.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available