4.7 Article

Zn-Ni reaction in the alkaline zinc-air battery using a nickel-supported air electrode

Journal

MATERIALS TODAY ENERGY
Volume 21, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtener.2021.100823

Keywords

Zinc-air batteries; Reverse air electrode; Zn-Ni contact; Performance degradation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Founda-tion of China [21706013]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Auto-motive Safety and Energy [KF2024]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Researchers have developed a zinc-air battery with a reverse air electrode structure based on Zn-Ni reaction, improving the stability and cycling life of the battery. This novel zinc-air battery not only achieves high efficiency and high specific energy in primary battery, but also demonstrates considerable cycling life in secondary battery.
Zinc-air batteries would be a promising candidate for energy conversion and storage because of their dense energy and effective cost. The metal nickel is extensively used for current collection and framework support of the air electrode in consideration of its outstanding anticorrosion property and conductivity. However, the reaction of zinc and nickel in zinc-air batteries has not been reported. Here, we show a novel zinc-air battery with a reverse structure of the air electrode based on Zn-Ni reaction, where nickel foam of the air electrode is oriented toward the zinc electrode, protecting the catalytic layer of the air electrode from impurity coverage and inhibiting dendrite growth. A zinc-air primary battery with the reverse air electrode exhibits a stable discharging ability of >1000 h around 1.4 V, achieving a capacity of 0.73 A h g(Zn)(-1) and a specific energy of 874 W h kg(Zn)(-1) Moreover, a zinc-air secondary battery with the reverse air electrode obtains more than 700 h cycles at the current density of 10 mA/cm(2) without battery failure. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available