4.6 Article

Systemic immune reaction in axillary lymph nodes adds to tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in triple-negative breast cancer prognostication

Journal

NPJ BREAST CANCER
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41523-021-00292-y

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. K.C. Wong Postdoctoral Fellowship
  2. Breast Cancer Now
  3. Cancer Research UK
  4. Breast Cancer Now (and their legacy charity Breakthrough Breast Cancer) [CRUK/07/012, KCL-BCN-Q3]
  5. Breast Cancer Research Foundation [BCRF] [17-194]
  6. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81772840]
  7. Mrs Alison Millford

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reveals the correlation between TILs and germinal center formation with the prognosis of breast cancer patients, emphasizing the importance of assessing immune responses in both primary and lymph node sites for future research.
The level of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) in triple-negative (TNBC) and HER2-positive breast cancers convey prognostic information. The importance of systemic immunity to local immunity is unknown in breast cancer. We previously demonstrated that histological alterations in axillary lymph nodes (LNs) carry clinical relevance. Here, we capture local immune responses by scoring TILs at the primary tumor and systemic immune responses by recording the formation of secondary follicles, also known as germinal centers, in 2,857 cancer-free and involved axillary LNs on haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained sections from a retrospective cohort of 161 LN-positive triple-negative and HER2-positive breast cancer patients. Our data demonstrate that the number of germinal center formations across all cancer-free LNs, similar to high levels of TILs, is associated with a good prognosis in low TILs TNBC. This highlights the importance of assessing both primary and LN immune responses for prognostication and for future breast cancer research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available