4.2 Article

Packings of 3D stars: stability and structure

Journal

GRANULAR MATTER
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10035-016-0606-4

Keywords

Granular; Cylindrical packing; Star-shaped particle; Stability; Friction; Vibration; Aggregate

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [DMR-1206351]
  2. W. M. Keck Foundation
  3. ITASCA Educational Partnership Program
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  5. Division Of Materials Research [1206351] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We describe a series of experiments involving the creation of cylindrical packings of star-shaped particles, and an exploration of the stability of these packings. The stars cover a broad range of arm sizes and frictional properties. We carried out three different kinds of experiments, all of which involve columns that are prepared by raining star particles one-by-one into hollow cylinders. As an additional part of the protocol, we sometimes vibrated the column before removing the confining cylinder. We rate stability in terms of r, the ratio of the mass of particles that fall off a pile when it collapsed, to the total particle mass. The first experiment involved the intrinsic stability of the column when the confining cylinder was removed. The second kind of experiment involved adding a uniform load to the top of the column, and then determining the collapse properties. A third experiment involved testing stability to tipping of the piles. We find a stability diagram relating the pile height, h, versus pile diameter, delta, where the stable and unstable regimes are separated by a boundary that is roughly a power-law in h versus delta with an exponent that is less than unity. Increasing vibration and friction, particularly the latter, both tend to stabilize piles, while increasing particle size can destabilize the system under certain conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available