4.7 Article

Flow Field Measurement of Laboratory-Scaled Cross-Flow Hydrokinetic Turbines: Part II-The Near-Wake of Twin Turbines in Counter-Rotating Configurations

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jmse9070777

Keywords

cross-flow turbine; vertical-axis; marine hydrokinetic; counter-rotating; power measurement; water tunnel

Funding

  1. Keio Design The Future award
  2. Keio Leading-Edge Laboratory of Science and Technology Grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study conducted monoscopic particle image velocimetry measurements of the near-wake of two cross-flow hydrokinetic turbines in six different counter-rotating configurations and found a correlation between flow field structures and power output. The effects of each parameter of the counter-rotating configurations were discussed, providing guidelines for setting up multiple devices in a power farm.
Cross-flow hydrokinetic turbines have sparked interest among fluid dynamicists for their potential for power enhancement in paired configuration. Following the first part of a laboratory-scaled turbine wake measurement project, this second part presents a monoscopic particle image velocimetry measurement of the near-wake of two cross-flow hydrokinetic turbines in six different counter-rotating configurations. The turbines operated in a small water flume at an average diameter-based Reynolds number of 2x104 with the incoming streamwise velocity of 0.316 m/s. The six configurations included two turbine separation distances, two turbine phase angles differences, and two different relative incoming flow angles. Similar to the observation of the single turbine configurations in part I, a correlation between flow field structures and the corresponding power output was observed. Effects of each parameter of the counter-rotating configurations are further discussed, which suggest guidelines for setting up multiple devices in a power farm. This article is accompanied by all full numeric data sets and videos of the results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available