4.6 Article

Mechanical and structural properties of bulk magnesium materials prepared via spark plasma sintering

Journal

MATERIALS TODAY COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 28, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.102569

Keywords

Magnesium powder metallurgy; SPS; Three-point bending; Hardness; Microhardness; Microstructure

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic [CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_013/0001823]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Field-assisted sintering, specifically using spark plasma sintering (SPS), was employed to prepare magnesium materials in this study, revealing that loose powder cold-compacted samples yielded better results than green compacts. Increasing cold-compaction pressure of green compacts reduced porosity, while SPS only positively affected properties in loose powder and low cold-compacted green compacts.
Field-assisted sintering is a modern approach to novel magnesium materials preparation; however, it is unclear whether it is better to sinter green compact or loose powder. This work focuses on preparing bulk materials from loose and cold-compacted magnesium powder through a field-assisted sintering technique - spark plasma sintering (SPS). Green compacts were prepared under a series of compacting pressures from 100 MPa to 500 MPa. SPS was performed at 400 degrees C, 500 degrees C, and 600 degrees C applying additional pressure of 100 MPa during the sintering process. Prepared materials were analysed regarding their microstructure, hardness, and micmhardness and through the three-point bending test and fractography. The green compacts porosity decreased with increased cold-compaction pressure. The SPS positively affected porosity and mechanical properties only in loose powder and the lowest cold-compacted green compacts. Increasing cold compaction pressure of the green compacts above 200 MPa is therefore unfavourable for further SPS processing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available