4.6 Article

Effect of ion species on change in particle electrophoresis caused by change in applied electric field

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.colcom.2021.100462

Keywords

Electric field; Electrolyte concentration; Electrophoresis; Electrophoretic mobility; Hofmeister effect; Ion hydration; Particle size; Polystyrene latex particle; Steric effect; Zeta potential

Funding

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [JP20K05194]
  2. Information Center of Particle Technology, Japan
  3. Iketani Science and Technology Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that with the increase of applied electric field, the accumulation of ions in the slipping layer decreased, and ions with higher hydrophilicity were less likely to accumulate. These results provide important information for evaluating the ion-accumulation state based on electrophoretic mobility measurements.
The effects of ion species (Li+, Na+, NH4+, Cs+, guanidinium (Gdm(+)), and tetraphenylarsonium (Ph4As+)) and applied electric fields on the electrophoretic mobility of hydrophobic sulfate polystyrene latex particles were experimentally investigated via direct measurements based on microscopic electrophoresis. At a high electrolyte concentration (50 mM), as the applied electric field increased, the electrophoretic mobility increased and the fraction of charge in the slipping layer (FOC) decreased, before converging to certain constant values for each cation; thus, the ion accumulation was weak, and the amount of cations in the slipping layer decreased as the applied electric field increased. Furthermore, FOC was smaller for cations with higher hydrophilicity, indicating that higher-hydration ions are less likely to accumulate in the slipping layer. These results can be useful for evaluating the ion-accumulation state around particles based on electrophoretic mobility measurements wherein the applied electric field is controlled as an operational parameter.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available