4.7 Article

Developing a radiometrically-dated chronologic sequence for Neogene biotic change in Australia, from the Riversleigh World Heritage Area of Queensland

Journal

GONDWANA RESEARCH
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages 153-167

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gr.2014.10.004

Keywords

U-Pb geochronology; Riversleigh; Speleothem; Biocorrelation

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [LE0989067, LP0989969, LP100200486, DP0985214, DP0664621, DP1094569, DP130100197, DE130100476]
  2. XSTRATA Community Partnership Program (North Queensland)
  3. University of New South Wales
  4. CREATE Fund
  5. Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service
  6. Environment Australia
  7. Queensland Museum
  8. Riversleigh Society Inc.
  9. Outback at Isa
  10. Mount Isa City Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Radiometric U-Pb ages are presented for the Riversleigh World Heritage fossil mammal site in northwestern Queensland, Australia. The ages are determined on speleothems which are generally found in intimate or well-documented association with fossil remains and thus can be assumed to record the age of the latter with a high degree of confidence. The new ages encompass the early (18.2-16.5 Ma) and middle Miocene (15.1-13.5 Ma) deposits at Riversleigh in addition to the younger Rackham's Roost Site which returns early Pleistocene ages. Together, these provide a robust chronological framework for the interpretation of Neogene biotic change in Australia that has, until now, relied almost entirely upon biocorrelative techniques. In particular they permit closer investigation of links between other regions/faunas and allow comparison with other records of climatic and environmental change. This is the first documented example of a methodology that has widespread potential application across many continents and throughout much of Earth history. (C) 2016 International Association for Gondwana Research. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available