4.5 Article

Polychaete Diversity Related to Different Mesophotic Bioconstructions along the Southeastern Italian Coast

Journal

DIVERSITY-BASEL
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/d13060239

Keywords

Polychaete Eunicida; Polychaete Serpulidae; marine bioconstructions; polychaete diversity; mesophotic bioconstructions; Mediterranean Sea; Southeastern Italian coast; Italian fauna

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In recently discovered mesophotic bioconstructions along the Southeastern Italian coast, polychaetes exhibit high species richness and turnover rates. Serpulidae and Eunicida are dominant in these bioconstructions, with their distribution influenced by current circulation patterns and different bioconstructors.
In the different mesophotic bioconstructions recently found along the Southeastern Italian coast, polychaetes have been proved to show high species richness and diversity, hitherto never investigated. In the present study, the species composition and functional role of polychaete assemblages were analysed; the updated key to identification of the Mediterranean species of genus Eunice was presented and some taxonomic issues were also discussed. On the total of 70 species Serpulidae and Eunicida were the dominant polychaetes. Facing similar levels of alpha-diversity, the polychaete assemblages showed a high turnover of species along the north-south gradient, clearly according to the current circulation pattern, as well as to the different bioconstructors as biological determinants. Indeed, Serpulidae were dominant on the mesophotic bioconstructions primarily formed by the deep-sea oyster Neopycnodonte cochlear, while the Eunicida prevailed on the mesophotic bioconstructions mainly built by scleractinians. Lastly, the record of Eunice dubitata was the first for the Mediterranean and Italian fauna and proved this species to be characteristic of mesophotic bioconstructions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available