4.5 Article

Quantifying Southern Pacific Rattlesnake (Crotalus oreganus helleri) Hunting Behavior through Community Science

Journal

DIVERSITY-BASEL
Volume 13, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/d13080349

Keywords

citizen science; conservation; ontogeny; behavioral lateralization; snakes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Studying animal behaviors is crucial for understanding how organisms respond to environmental changes. This study utilized community science to investigate the hunting behaviors of rattlesnakes, revealing differences in microhabitat use between juvenile and adult snakes. Additionally, the research showed the potential of using community science to study the behaviors of cryptic predators.
It is increasingly important to study animal behaviors as these are the first responses organisms mount against environmental changes. Rattlesnakes, in particular, are threatened by habitat loss and human activity, and require costly tracking by researchers to quantify the behaviors of wild individuals. Here, we show how photo-vouchered observations submitted by community members can be used to study cryptic predators like rattlesnakes. We utilized two platforms, iNaturalist and HerpMapper, to study the hunting behaviors of wild Southern Pacific Rattlesnakes. From 220 observation photos, we quantified the direction of the hunting coil (i.e., handedness), microhabitat use, timing of observations, and age of the snake. With these data, we looked at whether snakes exhibited an ontogenetic shift in behaviors. We found no age differences in coil direction. However, there was a difference in the microhabitats used by juveniles and adults while hunting. We also found that juveniles were most commonly observed during the spring, while adults were more consistently observed throughout the year. Overall, our study shows the potential of using community science to study the behaviors of cryptic predators.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available