4.4 Article

The Hubble Tension, the M Crisis of Late Time H(z) Deformation Models and the Reconstruction of Quintessence Lagrangians

Journal

UNIVERSE
Volume 7, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/universe7080300

Keywords

dark energy; LCDM; wCDM; CPL; cosmological data; reconstruction

Funding

  1. European Union (European Social Fund-ESF) through the Operational Programme Human Resources Development, Education and Lifelong Learning 2014-2020 [MIS 5047648]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study provides a detailed analysis of recent cosmological data, including CMB, BAO, and SnIa, to constrain dark energy parameterizations. The results show inconsistencies with locally determined values and reveal late phantom behavior in the dark energy equation-of-state parameter.
We present a detailed and pedagogical analysis of recent cosmological data, including CMB, BAO, SnIa and the recent local measurement of H-0. We thus obtain constraints on the parameters of these standard dark energy parameterizations, including Lambda CDM, and H(z) deformation models such as wCDM (constant equation of state w of dark energy), and the CPL model (corresponding to the evolving dark energy equation-of-state parameter w (z) = w(0) + w(a) z/1+z). The fitted parameters include the dark matter density Omega(0m), the SnIa absolute magnitude M, the Hubble constant H-0 and the dark energy parameters (e.g., w for wCDM). All models considered lead to a best-fit value of M that is inconsistent with the locally determined value obtained by Cepheid calibrators (M tension). We then use the best-fit dark energy parameters to reconstruct the quintessence Lagrangian that would be able to reproduce these best-fit parameterizations. Due to the derived late phantom behavior of the best-fit dark energy equation-of-state parameter w(z), the reconstructed quintessence models have a negative kinetic term and are therefore plagued with instabilities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available