4.7 Article

Energy savings using sunspaces to preheat ventilation intake air: Experimental and simulation study

Journal

JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING
Volume 40, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102343

Keywords

Sunspace; Solar heating; Mechanical ventilation; Heat recovery; Heat storage; Prototype

Funding

  1. Department of Environment, Territorial Planning and Housing of the Basque Government
  2. Department of Architecture of the University of the Basque Country

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explores the potential benefits of sunspaces in preheating ventilation intake air to reduce building energy consumption. Results show that sunspaces can greatly improve energy behavior, with savings depending largely on climate. In colder zones, especially when combined with heat recovery ventilation, significant energy savings can be achieved through the use of sunspaces.
This paper investigates the potential benefits of sunspaces to preheat the ventilation intake air to reduce the energy consumption of buildings. When sunspaces are combined with a mechanical ventilation system, it is possible to easily introduce the preheated air into every space of the building, which is of great relevance for energy savings. A modular sunspace prototype was designed and built to analyze its real thermal behavior. After validating the simulation model with experimental results, different sunspace configurations were tested in a residential building for different climates. Our findings indicate that sunspaces can significantly improve the energy behavior of the building, but the savings depend on different factors. First and foremost, the effectiveness of these systems clearly depends on the climate. While in zones with little need for heating the sunspace use is not advisable, in colder zones the energy savings are substantial, even more if they are combined with heat recovery ventilation. In the coldest climatic zone in Spain, annual primary energy savings of 38.48 kWh.m(-2) were achieved with the best sunspace configuration, which represents a heating saving of 58%. Results also reveal that inertia is not convenient when using heat recovery ventilation. Lastly, when choosing the size of the sunspace, as its efficiency depends on its size, not only total savings should be considered, but also the investment to be made and its return.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available