4.6 Review

Diagnostics and Management of Male Infertility in Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia

Journal

DIAGNOSTICS
Volume 11, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11091550

Keywords

PCD; sperm; male fertility; ICSI

Funding

  1. NIHR [PDF-2017-10-098]
  2. Imperial NIHR BRC
  3. National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR) [PDF-2017-10-098] Funding Source: National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) is a disease caused by malfunction of motile cilia, leading to chronic respiratory infections and male infertility. Studies have shown that PCD genes may impact sperm development and male fertility, but further research is needed to understand their specific roles.
Primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD), a disease caused by the malfunction of motile cilia, manifests mainly with chronic recurrent respiratory infections. In men, PCD is also often associated with infertility due to immotile sperm. Since causative mutations for PCD were identified in over 50 genes, the role of these genes in sperm development should be investigated in order to understand the effect of PCD mutations on male fertility. Previous studies showed that different dynein arm heavy chains are present in respiratory cilia and sperm flagellum, which may partially explain the variable effects of mutations on airways and fertility. Furthermore, recent studies showed that male reproductive tract motile cilia may play an important part in sperm maturation and transport. In some PCD patients, extremely low sperm counts were reported, which may be due to motile cilia dysfunction in the reproductive tract rather than problems with sperm development. However, the exact roles of PCD genes in male fertility require additional studies, as do the treatment options. In this review, we discuss the diagnostic and treatment options for men with PCD based on the current knowledge.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available