Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Accuracy of MRI-guided Versus Systematic Prostate Biopsy in Patients Under Active Surveillance: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Willy Baccaglini et al.
CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER (2021)
Who can safely evade a magnetic resonance imaging fusion-targeted biopsy (MRIFTB) for prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) 3 lesion?
Myong Kim et al.
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2021)
Added value of systematic biopsy in men with a clinical suspicion of prostate cancer undergoing biparametric MRI-targeted biopsy: multi-institutional external validation study
Ugo Falagario et al.
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2021)
The Value of Prostate-specific Antigen Density for Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System 3 Lesions on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Strategy to Avoid Unnecessary Prostate Biopsies
Magdalena Goertz et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS (2021)
Role of Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging before Confirmatory Biopsy in Assessing the Risk of Prostate Cancer Progression during Active Surveillance
Joseba Salguero et al.
KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY (2021)
Optimising the number of cores for magnetic resonance imaging-guided targeted and systematic transperineal prostate biopsy
Nienke L. Hansen et al.
BJU INTERNATIONAL (2020)
Performing Precise Biopsy in Naive Patients With Equivocal PI-RADS, Version 2, Score 3, Lesions: An MRI-based Nomogram to Avoid Unnecessary Surgical Intervention
Yu Zhang et al.
CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER (2020)
Negative Predictive Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Era: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Niranjan J. Sathianathen et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2020)
Personalized strategies in population screening for prostate cancer
Sebastiaan Remmers et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER (2020)
Variability of the Positive Predictive Value of PI-RADS for Prostate MRI across 26 Centers: Experience of the Society o Abdominal Radiology Prostate Cancer Disease-focused Panel
Antonio C. Westphalen et al.
RADIOLOGY (2020)
Multicenter analysis of clinical and MRI characteristics associated with detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in PI-RADS (v2.0) category 3 lesions
Bashir Al Hussein Al Awamlh et al.
UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS (2020)
Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Alone is Insufficient to Detect Grade Reclassification in Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer
Carissa E. Chu et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2020)
Combining clinical and MRI data to manage PI-RADS 3 lesions and reduce excessive biopsy
Shuo Yang et al.
TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY (2020)
Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System 3 Category Cases at Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Martina Maggi et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS (2020)
Noninvasive biomarkers to guide intervention: toward personalized patient management in prostate cancer
Maria Frantzi et al.
EXPERT REVIEW OF PRECISION MEDICINE AND DRUG DEVELOPMENT (2020)
Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-directed Biopsy Strategies for Changing the Paradigm of Prostate Cancer Diagnosis
Ivo G. Schoots et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY (2020)
Which clinical and radiological characteristics can predict clinically significant prostate cancer in PI-RADS 3 lesions? A retrospective study in a high-volume academic center
Isabeau Hermie et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY (2019)
Systematic Biopsy Does Not Contribute to Disease Upgrading in Patients Undergoing Targeted Biopsy for PI-RADS 5 Lesions Identified on Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Course of Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer
Ahmad Arabi et al.
UROLOGY (2019)
Use of prostate systematic and targeted biopsy on the basis of multiparametric MRI in biopsy-naive patients (MRI-FIRST): a prospective, multicentre, paired diagnostic study
Olivier Rouviere et al.
LANCET ONCOLOGY (2019)
New Approach to Guide Target Prostate Biopsy: Technique and Initial Experience
Enrique Gomez Gomez et al.
UROLOGY (2018)
Cancer Statistics, 2018
Rebecca L. Siegel et al.
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS (2018)
A Contemporary Prostate Biopsy Risk Calculator Based on Multiple Heterogeneous Cohorts
Donna P. Ankerst et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2018)
Results of Targeted Biopsy in Men with Magnetic Resonance Imaging Lesions Classified Equivocal, Likely or Highly Likely to Be Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
Wulphert Venderink et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2018)
MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis
V Kasivisvanathan et al.
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2018)
Characterizing indeterminate (Likert-score 3/5) peripheral zone prostate lesions with PSA density, PI-RADS scoring and qualitative descriptors on multiparametric MRI
Mrishta Brizmohun Appayya et al.
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY (2018)
Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study
Hashim U. Ahmed et al.
LANCET (2017)
The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System
Jonathan I. Epstein et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY (2016)
Prostate cancer risk prediction using the novel versions of the European Randomised Study for Screening of Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) and Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT) risk calculators: independent validation and comparison in a contemporary European cohort
Cedric Poyet et al.
BJU INTERNATIONAL (2016)
Prostate cancer detection on transrectal ultrasonography-guided random biopsy despite negative real-time magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion-guided targeted biopsy: reasons for targeted biopsy failure
Hannes Cash et al.
BJU INTERNATIONAL (2016)
The detection of significant prostate cancer is correlated with the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) in MRI/transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy
Hannes Cash et al.
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2016)
Comparison of MR/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Biopsy With Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer
M. Minhaj Siddiqui et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2015)
Share Paper
