4.6 Review

Screening for Pulmonary Hypertension in Systemic Sclerosis-A Primer for Cardio-Rheumatology Clinics

Journal

DIAGNOSTICS
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11061013

Keywords

systemic sclerosis; pulmonary hypertension; screening; cardio-rheumatology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare disease with unfavorable prognosis, and pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and interstitial lung disease (ILD) are the main causes of morbi-mortality, emphasizing the importance of early detection and treatment for better outcomes.
Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare disease, with unfavorable clinical course and prognosis, characterized by progressive multisystemic involvement. SSc associated pulmonary hypertension (SSc-PAH) and interstitial lung disease (ILD) are the most important factors for morbi-mortality in these patients, being responsible for more than 60% of total deaths. Though pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is the dominant subtype seen in SSc, PH secondary to ILD, left-heart pathology, and pulmonary veno-occlusive disease (PVOD) are also possible occurrences. Initial evaluation of a SSc case is complex and should be performed with a multidisciplinary approach. Early detection of SSc-PAH is imperative, given the fact that new and effective medications are available and early treatment was shown to improve outcomes. Therefore, screening algorithms must be used adequately and in a cost-effective manner. Sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) are the most important performance measures in a screening test. Several algorithms were developed in the last decade (e.g., DETECT and ASIG) and demonstrated higher efficiency when compared to older algorithms. The present manuscript details the risk factors for SSc-PAH and includes a critical description of current detection algorithms, as a primer for clinicians working in the field of cardio-rheumatology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available