4.6 Article

Infrared Thermography as a Method of Verification in Raynaud's Phenomenon

Journal

DIAGNOSTICS
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11060981

Keywords

cold challenge; diagnostic method; infrared thermographic imaging; secondary Raynaud's phenomenon; vibration white finger

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study evaluated the performance of a thermographic algorithm as a diagnostic replacement for the currently applied finger systolic pressure test in patients suspected of having Raynaud's phenomenon. The new algorithm showed noninferiority to the traditional test, with good sensitivity and specificity, proving to be a useful tool for diagnosing RP.
Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) is characterized by the episodic whitening of the fingers upon exposure to cold. A recently described thermographic algorithm was proposed as a diagnostic replacement of the currently applied finger systolic pressure (FSP) test. The aim of the study was to evaluate the performance of the thermographic algorithm when applied in patients suspected of having RP. Forty-three patients were examined using thermographic imaging after local cooling of the hands in water of 10 degrees C for 1 min. The thermographic algorithm was applied to predict the probability of RP. The performance of the algorithm was evaluated with different cut-off levels. A new algorithm was proposed based on patients from the target population. The performance of the tested algorithm was noninferior to the FSP test, when a cut-off level of 0.05 was applied, yielding a sensitivity and specificity of 69% and 58%, respectively. The accuracy was 66%. The FSP test had a sensitivity and specificity of 77% and 37%, respectively, and the accuracy was 59%. The thermographic method proved useful for detecting RP and was able to replace the FSP test as a diagnostic test. The alternative algorithm revealed that other thermographic variables were more predictive of the target population, but this should be verified in future patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available