4.6 Article

Experimental Validation of a Microwave System for Brain Stroke 3-D Imaging

Journal

DIAGNOSTICS
Volume 11, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11071232

Keywords

microwave imaging; biomedical imaging; brain stroke monitoring; antenna array; hemorrhagic stroke; ischemic stroke

Funding

  1. Italian Ministry of University and Research
  2. European Union [764479]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study validates the ability of a microwave prototype device to localize hemorrhages and ischemias within the brain and proposes an innovative calibration technique based on measured data. The microwave imaging system operates at 1 GHz with a low-complexity architecture, providing 3-D images of the brain region. The imaging algorithm utilizes a differential approach and accurate numerical models for effective device validation.
This paper experimentally validates the capability of a microwave prototype device to localize hemorrhages and ischemias within the brain as well as proposes an innovative calibration technique based on the measured data. In the reported experiments, a 3-D human-like head phantom is considered, where the brain is represented either with a homogeneous liquid mimicking brain dielectric properties or with ex vivo calf brains. The microwave imaging (MWI) system works at 1 GHz, and it is realized with a low-complexity architecture formed by an array of twenty-four printed monopole antennas. Each antenna is embedded into the brick of a semi-flexible dielectric matching medium, and it is positioned conformal to the head upper part. The imaging algorithm exploits a differential approach and provides 3-D images of the brain region. It employs the singular value decomposition of the discretized scattering operator obtained via accurate numerical models. The MWI system analysis shows promising reconstruction results and extends the device validation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available