4.6 Article

Magnetic Fractions of PM2.5, PM2.5-10, and PM10 from Coal Fly Ash as Environmental Pollutants

Journal

ACS OMEGA
Volume 6, Issue 30, Pages 20076-20085

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.1c03187

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. [121031500198-3]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Characterization of magnetic particulate matter in coal fly ashes is crucial for evaluating health risks from industrial coal combustion and future applications. This study successfully separated magnetic narrow fractions related to hazardous PM2.5, PM2.5-10, and PM10 for the first time and identified their major components and phase composition. Mossbauer spectroscopy and magnetic measurements confirmed the formation mechanism of nanoscale epsilon-Fe2O3 particles.
Characterization of magnetic particulate matter (PM) in coal fly ashes is critical to assessing the health risks associated with industrial coal combustion and for future applications of fine fractions that will minimize solid waste pollution. In this study, magnetic narrow fractions of fine ferrospheres related to environmentally hazardous PM2.5, PM2.5-10, and PM10 were for the first time separated from fly ash produced during combustion of Ekibastuz coal. It was determined that the average diameter of globules in narrow fractions is 1, 2, 3, and 7 mu m. The major components of chemical composition are Fe2O3 (57-60) wt %, SiO2 (25-28 wt %), and Al2O3 (10-12 wt %). The phase composition is represented by crystalline phases, including ferrospinel, alpha-Fe2O3, epsilon-Fe2O3, mullite, and quartz, as well as the amorphous glass phase. Mossbauer spectroscopy and magnetic measurements confirmed the formation of nanoscale particles of epsilon-Fe2O3. Stabilization of the epsilon-Fe2O3 metastable phase, with quite ideal distribution of iron cations, occurs in the glass matrix due to the rapid cooling of fine globules during their formation from mineral components of coal.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available