4.6 Article

Thermal and Kinetic Studies on Biomass Degradation via Thermogravimetric Analysis: A Combination of Model-Fitting and Model-Free Approach

Journal

ACS OMEGA
Volume 6, Issue 34, Pages 22233-22247

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.1c02937

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. University Graduate Teaching Fellowship of University of Saskatchewan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The thermal degradation behavior and kinetics of agricultural and forestry biomass residues were investigated using different models, revealing differences in degradation steps and mechanisms between the two types of biomass. Agricultural residues required three distinct steps for pyrolysis, while wood residues degraded in two steps.
Thermal degradation behavior and kinetics of two agricultural (soy and oat hulls) and two forestry biomass (willow and spruce) residues were investigated using a unique combination of model-fitting and model-free methods. Experiments were carried out in an inert atmosphere at different heating rates. Both single step and multistep models were explored in deriving activation energies, frequency factors, and mechanisms of all four biomass residues. For the single step models, activation energy values ranged from 107.2 kJ/mol for willow and 139.7 kJ/mol for soy hull, and the frequency factors for both materials were 1.1 x 10(9) and 2.66 x 10(12) s(-1), respectively. The multistep models gave further insight into the different mechanisms across the full degradation spectrum. There was an observed difference between the number of distinct steps/mechanisms for the agriculture-based versus wood-based biomass materials, with pyrolysis occurring in three distinct steps for the agricultural biomass residues while the woody residues degraded in two steps. The difference in the number of distinct steps can be attributed to the composition and distribution of components of the biomass, which would differ based on the nature and source of the biomass.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available