4.6 Article

Effect of Drying on the Fabrication of MgAl Layered Double Hydroxides

Journal

ACS OMEGA
Volume 6, Issue 33, Pages 21819-21829

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.1c03581

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq/Brazil)
  2. Coordenaco de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES/Brazil)
  3. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Alagoas (FAPEAL/Brazil)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study evaluated the influence of drying parameters on the properties of MgAl/LDH, finding that drying time and temperature had a considerable impact on the chemical, physical, structural, and morphological properties of LDH.
This study aimed to evaluate the synthesis of MgAl/LDH from the drying process perspective, evaluating the influence of temperature (75-90 degrees C) and time (16-20 h) in the drying process. The synthesis was performed, maintaining a ratio of 2:1 of Mg/Al, and the drying was conducted according to a 2(2) experimental design: four axial points and three repetitions at the central point. The surface area and pore diameter ranged from 4.09 to 18.55 m(2)/g and 12.50 to 24.46 nm. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) analysis indicated the drying-caused variation of the LDH typical bands intensities. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images showed the tendency of the increase of agglomeration with the temperature elevation. The drying parameters' influence was evident for X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis observing the crystallite size increment, from 13.10 to 38.94 nm, and basal spacing variation, from 7.52 to 7.64 angstrom. The statistical models for growing crystal and reduction of the basal spacing were physically consistent but with low values of R-2. The drying time and temperature had a considerable influence on the chemical, physical, structural, and morphological properties of LDH.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available