4.6 Article

Identification of Components in Citri Sarcodactylis Fructus from Different Origins via UPLC-Q-Exactive Orbitrap/MS

Journal

ACS OMEGA
Volume 6, Issue 26, Pages 17045-17057

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.1c02124

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFC1701103]
  2. Technology Plan of Zhuhai in 2020 [ZH22036207200009PWC]
  3. Cultivation Plan for HighLevel University Academic Backbone of Guangzhou Medical University in 2017 [gydf[2017]210]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study systematically analyzed the chemical constituents of Citri Sarcodactylis Fructus from different origins using UPLC-Q-Exactive Orbitrap/MS, and found that CSF produced in Zhejiang province contained a richer variety of chemical compositions. Additionally, 15 components that have not been reported previously in the CSF were identified.
To systematically analyze the chemical constituents of Citri Sarcodactylis Fructus (CSF) from different origins, an efficient approach based on ultraperformance liquid chromatography plus Q-Exactive Orbitrap tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-Q-Exactive Orbitrap/MS) detection for the discrimination of chemical components from of 15 batches of CSF from four main origins was used in this research. Through parent peaks, fragment peaks, fragmentation characteristics, and comparative analysis with the literature and reference standards, a total of 77 components from the methanol extracts including 18 coumarins, 24 flavonoids, seven organic acids, three limonoids, and 25 other compounds were detected and identified. Among them, 15 components have not been reported previously in the CSF. Notably, the stachydrine peak initially showed a higher content in the total ion current chromatogram. Overall, CSF produced in the Zhejiang province contained a richer variety of chemical compositions. These observations provided a theoretical basis for the further quality assessment and application of CSF.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available