4.7 Article

New Insights of Potassium Sources Impacts as Foliar Application on 'Canino' Apricot Fruit Yield, Fruit Anatomy, Quality and Storability

Journal

PLANTS-BASEL
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/plants10061163

Keywords

K-sources; fruit anatomy; apricot; yield; quality; storability

Categories

Funding

  1. Deanship of Scientific Research at King Khalid University [RGP 2/165/42]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study showed that foliar application of potassium salts can improve apricot fruit yield, color, and physical attributes, as well as enhance storage tolerance. Among the potassium sources tested, K-nitrate was the most effective in improving fruit yield and maintaining postharvest quality characteristics.
This is the first report to study the impacts of potassium sources on apricot fruit yield, quality and storability as a preharvest foliar application. Five sources of potassium (K-humate, K-sulphate, K-nitrate, K-silicate and K-citrate), plus water as a control treatment, were applied individually at 0.2% three times on 'Canino' apricot over the 2019 and 2020 seasons. The results showed that all potassium salts, applied foliarly, have potential to improve yield, fruit color, and some fruit physical attributes, such as: weight, size and firmness, as well as a reduced lipid peroxidation, accompanied by a low fruit malondialdehyde content reflected in a high tolerance during storage. The K-nitrate treatment was more effective in the improvement of fruit yield, preharvest quality parameters and keeping fruit postharvest quality characteristics from sharp decline during cold storage. Concerning fruit anatomy, K-nitrate and K-citrate showed thicker cuticle and epidermal parenchyma cell diameters, while the K-silicate induced the highest cell wall thickness. K-nitrate was the most economical, and could be recommended for apricot growers in the Nubaria region of Egypt.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available