4.6 Review

Lagomorpha as a Model Morphological System

Journal

FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2021.636402

Keywords

Lagomorpha; Leporidae; Ochotonidae; evolution; morphofunction; model organism; morphology; phylogeny

Categories

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council Future Fellowship [ARC FT190100803]
  2. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation - Federal Ministry for Education and Research (Germany)
  3. United States National Science Foundation [BCS-1749453, BCS-1029149/1214767, BCS-0924592/1214766]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

European rabbits are recognizable almost anywhere on our planet due to their global distribution and unique characteristics. The lagomorph group offers underappreciated levels of diversity, making it a strong system for studying macro- and micro-scale patterns of morphological change.
Due to their global distribution, invasive history, and unique characteristics, European rabbits are recognizable almost anywhere on our planet. Although they are members of a much larger group of living and extinct mammals [Mammalia, Lagomorpha (rabbits, hares, and pikas)], the group is often characterized by several well-known genera (e.g., Oryctolagus, Sylvilagus, Lepus, and Ochotona). This representation does not capture the extraordinary diversity of behavior and form found throughout the order. Model organisms are commonly used as exemplars for biological research, but there are a limited number of model clades or lineages that have been used to study evolutionary morphology in a more explicitly comparative way. We present this review paper to show that lagomorphs are a strong system in which to study macro- and micro-scale patterns of morphological change within a clade that offers underappreciated levels of diversity. To this end, we offer a summary of the status of relevant aspects of lagomorph biology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available