4.7 Article

Do Ballast Water Management Systems Reduce Phytoplankton Introductions to Canadian Waters?

Journal

FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2021.691723

Keywords

aquatic invasive species; ballast water management; ballast water treatment; microalgae; phytoplankton; Pacific coast

Funding

  1. Transport Canada and Fisheries, and Oceans Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Global coastal aquatic ecosystems are negatively impacted by harmful aquatic species introduced through ships' ballast water discharge. A study comparing the abundance and diversity of phytoplankton managed by BWMS or BWE + BWMS to BWE alone found significantly lower phytoplankton abundance in samples managed by BWMS or BWE + BWMS. Ballast water managed by BWMS tended to have lower abundances of harmful phytoplankton species.
Global coastal aquatic ecosystems are negatively impacted by the introduction of harmful aquatic species through the discharge of ships' ballast water. To reduce discharges of harmful aquatic organisms and pathogens, such as toxic phytoplankton species, ships are now transitioning to the use of ballast water management systems (BWMS) instead of ballast water exchange (BWE). This study examines the abundance and diversity of phytoplankton in ballast water managed by BWMS (or a combination of both BWE + BWMS) in comparison to those in ballast water managed by BWE alone (collected from ships arriving to Canada's Pacific coast in 2017-2018 and 2008, respectively). The abundance and diversity of phytoplankton species were also examined in relation to key variables such as ballast water salinity and ballast water age. Total abundance of phytoplankton was significantly lower in preserved samples managed by either a BWMS or BWE + BWMS compared to BWE alone. Abundances in preserved samples were higher than observed in fresh (unpreserved) samples at the time of collection, with all samples managed by a BWMS meeting international limits for the number of viable organisms >= 10 and < 50 mu m in minimum dimension (based on six 1-mL live counts). While there was no apparent influence of factors such as treatment type [e.g., ultraviolet (UV) or chlorine], presence of filtration, ballast water salinity, ballast water age, nor location of last ballast water uptake on phytoplankton abundances in preserved samples, power to detect differences may be limited by sample size. Ballast water managed by BWMS also tended to have lower abundances of harmful phytoplankton species, although the difference was not statistically significant - additional research into the community composition of live cells in fresh samples could be valuable to discriminate the risk associated with phytoplankton surviving ballast water treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available