4.8 Article

An integrated pan-tropical biomass map using multiple reference datasets

Journal

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages 1406-1420

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13139

Keywords

aboveground biomass; carbon cycle; forest inventory; forest plots; REDD; remote sensing; satellite mapping; tropical forest

Funding

  1. EU FP7 GEOCARBON [283080]
  2. NORAD [QZA-10/0468]
  3. ESA GlobBiomass project [4000113100/14/I-NB]
  4. AusAID within CIFOR's Global Comparative Study on REDD+ [46167]
  5. German Federal Ministry for the Environment
  6. Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU) International Climate Initiative (IKI) through the project 'From Climate Research to Action under Multilevel Governance: Building Knowledge and Capacity at Landscape Scale'
  7. Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (EMBRAPA)
  8. US Forest Service
  9. USAID
  10. US Department of State
  11. Aberystwyth University
  12. University of New South Wales (UNSW)
  13. Queensland Department of Science, Information Technology and Innovation (DSITI)
  14. Avatar Alliance Foundation
  15. John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
  16. NSF [1146206]
  17. European Research Council (T-FORCES)
  18. CIFOR/USAID
  19. Philip Leverhulme Prize
  20. NERC [NE/M021998/1, NE/I021217/1, ceh020002] Funding Source: UKRI
  21. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/B504630/1, NE/M021998/1, ceh020002, NE/I021217/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We combined two existing datasets of vegetation aboveground biomass (AGB) (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 2011, 9899; Nature Climate Change, 2, 2012, 182) into a pan-tropical AGB map at 1-km resolution using an independent reference dataset of field observations and locally calibrated high-resolution biomass maps, harmonized and upscaled to 14477 1-km AGB estimates. Our data fusion approach uses bias removal and weighted linear averaging that incorporates and spatializes the biomass patterns indicated by the reference data. The method was applied independently in areas (strata) with homogeneous error patterns of the input (Saatchi and Baccini) maps, which were estimated from the reference data and additional covariates. Based on the fused map, we estimated AGB stock for the tropics (23.4 N-23.4 S) of 375 Pg dry mass, 9-18% lower than the Saatchi and Baccini estimates. The fused map also showed differing spatial patterns of AGB over large areas, with higher AGB density in the dense forest areas in the Congo basin, Eastern Amazon and South-East Asia, and lower values in Central America and in most dry vegetation areas of Africa than either of the input maps. The validation exercise, based on 2118 estimates from the reference dataset not used in the fusion process, showed that the fused map had a RMSE 15-21% lower than that of the input maps and, most importantly, nearly unbiased estimates (mean bias 5Mg dry massha(-1) vs. 21 and 28Mgha(-1) for the input maps). The fusion method can be applied at any scale including the policy-relevant national level, where it can provide improved biomass estimates by integrating existing regional biomass maps as input maps and additional, country-specific reference datasets.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available