4.6 Article

Algorithm for Detection and Quantification of Hyperreflective Dots on Optical Coherence Tomography in Diabetic Macular Edema

Journal

FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.688986

Keywords

diabetic macular edema; diabetic retinopathy; optical coherence tomography; deep learning algorithm; hyperreflective dots

Funding

  1. Guangdong Province Science and Technology Special Fund Project Supporting Directed Training of Ph.D. [20200405]
  2. Shantou Science and Technology Program [190917085269835]
  3. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFA0701700]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study developed an algorithm using deep learning technology to detect and quantify HRDs on OCT for DME patients. The algorithm showed stronger correlation and higher ICC with rater 1 compared to inter-rater agreement, providing an objective and repeatable tool for OCT analysis in clinical practice and research.
Purpose: To develop an algorithm to detect and quantify hyperreflective dots (HRDs) on optical coherence tomography (OCT) in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME).& nbsp;Materials and Methods: Twenty OCTs (each OCT contains 128 b scans) from 20 patients diagnosed with DME were included in this study. Two types of HRDs, hard exudates and small HRDs (hypothesized to be activated microglia), were identified and labeled independently by two raters. An algorithm using deep learning technology was developed based on input (in total 2,560 OCT b scans) of manual labeling and differentiation of HRDs from rater 1. 4-fold cross-validation was used to train and validate the algorithm. Dice coefficient, intraclass coefficient (ICC), correlation coefficient, and Bland-Altman plot were used to evaluate agreement of the output parameters between two methods (either between two raters or between one rater and proposed algorithm).& nbsp;Results: The Dice coefficients of total HRDs, hard exudates, and small HRDs area of the algorithm were 0.70 +/- 0.10, 0.72 +/- 0.11, and 0.46 +/- 0.06, respectively. The correlations between rater 1 and proposed algorithm (range: 0.95-0.99, all p < 0.001) were stronger than the correlations between the two raters (range: 0.84-0.96, all p < 0.001) for all parameters. The ICCs were higher for all the parameters between rater 1 and proposed algorithm (range: 0.972-0.997) than those between the two raters (range: 0.860-0.953).& nbsp;Conclusions: Our proposed algorithm is a good tool to detect and quantify HRDs and can provide objective and repeatable information of OCT for DME patients in clinical practice and studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available