4.5 Article

Association of Fungi and Archaea of the Gut Microbiota with Crohn's Disease in Pediatric Patients-Pilot Study

Journal

PATHOGENS
Volume 10, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pathogens10091119

Keywords

fungi; archaea; gut microbiota; Crohn's disease; gut dysbiosis

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Center in Poland [2019/33/N/NZ5/00698]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The presence and quantity of specific fungi in the intestines of pediatric patients with Crohn's disease are associated with disease activity, while there were no significant differences in archaea colonization. Further research on the entire archaeobiome and mycobiome is needed for a comprehensive understanding.
The composition of bacteria is often altered in Crohn's disease (CD), but its connection to the disease is not fully understood. Gut archaea and fungi have recently been suggested to play a role as well. In our study, the presence and number of selected species of fungi and archaea in pediatric patients with CD and healthy controls were evaluated. Stool samples were collected from children with active CD (n = 54), non-active CD (n = 37) and control subjects (n = 33). The prevalence and the number of selected microorganisms were assessed by real-time PCR. The prevalence of Candida tropicalis was significantly increased in active CD compared to non-active CD and the control group (p = 0.011 and p = 0.036, respectively). The number of Malassezia spp. cells was significantly lower in patients with active CD compared to the control group, but in non-active CD, a significant increase was observed (p = 0.005 and p = 0.020, respectively). There were no statistically significant differences in the colonization by archaea. The obtained results indicate possible correlations with the course of the CD; however, further studies of the entire archeobiome and the mycobiome are necessary in order to receive a complete picture.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available